April 18, 2026

TRIPURA STAR NEWS

Tripura's Latest News, Views & News Portal

When The Women’s Reservation Bill Stalled Again — And Congress, SP, DMK, And The INDIA Alliance Came Under Scrutiny : Dr. Shalini Ali, Social Worker.

Spread the love

New Delhi, Delhi, 18th of April 2026 : April 16–17, 2026: When the Women’s Reservation Bill Stalled Again — and Congress, SP, DMK, and the INDIA Alliance Came Under Scrutiny

The dates April 16 and 17, 2026, have been marked as a dark chapter in the history of India’s Parliament. A bill that half the country’s population has awaited for over three decades once again failed to be implemented. While the Women’s Reservation Bill was technically passed in 2023, the key enabling legislations — the Delimitation Amendment Bill and the Census Basis Amendment Bill — failed in the Lok Sabha on April 16 and in the Rajya Sabha on April 17.

The proceedings of these two days made it evident, according to critics, that the Congress, Samajwadi Party (SP), DMK, and the broader INDIA alliance collectively played a role in stalling its implementation.

April 16, 2026 – Lok Sabha: Disruption by Design

As the Lok Sabha convened at 11 a.m., the government introduced the Delimitation Amendment Bill, 2026. Its objective was to enable implementation of women’s reservation based on the 2011 Census, ensuring 33% reservation before the 2029 general elections.

However, the Congress parliamentary leadership immediately objected, stating that delimitation without a caste census was unacceptable. SP MPs entered the Well of the House, raising slogans demanding “quota within quota.” DMK members protested with placards alleging injustice toward southern states.

The Home Minister clarified repeatedly that under the proposed pro-rata formula, no southern state — including Tamil Nadu, Kerala, or Karnataka — would lose seats. Instead, the total number of Lok Sabha seats would increase from 543 to 816, ensuring no sitting MP lost representation.

Despite this, INDIA alliance parties adopted a coordinated walkout strategy.

At 2 p.m., during voting:

  • Congress issued a whip asking its MPs to remain absent
  • SP’s 37 MPs were present but abstained from voting
  • DMK’s 22 MPs pressed the NOTA option

Result: The bill was defeated — 202 votes in favor vs. 241 against.
Had Congress (98 MPs), SP (37), and DMK (22) supported it, the bill would have passed comfortably.

April 17, 2026 – Rajya Sabha: Same Script, Different House

The next day, the Census Basis Amendment Bill was introduced in the Rajya Sabha. Its aim was to delink women’s reservation from the upcoming 2027 Census and instead implement it using 2011 data.

Opposition reactions followed a similar pattern:

  • Congress called it an attack on federalism
  • DMK argued delimitation required state consent
  • SP reiterated demands for sub-quotas for OBC, Dalit, and minority women

Parties including TMC, RJD, and NCP (SP faction) joined in, submitting 23 amendments.

When the Chair suggested referring the bill to a Select Committee, the government objected, citing delays that would push implementation beyond 2029.

During voting:

  • Congress and DMK walked out
  • SP members disrupted proceedings, tore papers, and staged protests
  • The House was adjourned four times

At 8 p.m., the session ended without voting, causing the bill to lapse under parliamentary rules.

Role of Key Parties: Facts and Developments

1. Congress: A Contradictory Position
Despite supporting the bill in 2023, Congress introduced conditions in 2026 that were impractical to meet in the given timeframe. Linking women’s reservation to caste census effectively delayed implementation. Absenteeism in Lok Sabha and walkout in Rajya Sabha raised questions about its commitment.

2. Samajwadi Party: Repeated Obstruction
SP has historically opposed the bill — from tearing copies in 1998 to disruptions in 2010. Its demand for “quota within quota,” widely seen as constitutionally complex, has consistently stalled progress. Abstaining in Lok Sabha and disrupting Rajya Sabha proceedings directly impacted the outcome.

3. DMK: Regional Concerns or Political Strategy?
DMK raised concerns about southern states losing seats — despite the government’s assurance that seat counts would increase. Critics argue this narrative was misleading. The demand for state consent, despite delimitation being a central subject under Article 82, further delayed proceedings.

4. INDIA Alliance: Collective Responsibility
Other alliance partners — including RJD, NCP-SP, Shiv Sena (UBT), TMC, JMM, AAP, and CPM — also participated in walkouts and amendments. Observers note that had the alliance prioritized passage over opposition, the bill could have succeeded.

Outcome: Continued Delay

Following these events, it is now unlikely that 33% reservation for women will be implemented before the 2029 Lok Sabha elections. The government maintains that delimitation is essential, and opposition cooperation is necessary.

Critics point out that:

  • Congress delayed the bill between 1996–2014
  • SP has repeatedly disrupted it
  • DMK has consistently added new conditions

In 2026, under the INDIA alliance banner, the same pattern appeared to repeat.

The Unanswered Question

The failure of the Women’s Reservation Bill was not merely due to procedural hurdles. It reflected political choices.

Half the country continues to ask:
If there was support, why was there no vote?
If there were concerns, why was no solution found?

The answers, many believe, lie with Congress, the Samajwadi Party, the DMK, and the INDIA alliance.

About The Author